Jump to content

Talk:Forest Recreation Ground

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forest Recreation Ground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The name "Forest"

[edit]

Not sure the name really has much to do with Sherwood Forest and this lacks a citation at the moment. I've noticed that Edward IV created a new park or forested area for himself, based on Nottingham Castle, and Larkdale, one of the areas earmarked for it, seems to be an area north of the city centre, possibly including what is now the Forest rec. Larkdale St is just across Forest Rd. He extracted part of Larkdale from Dale Abbey to grant them a licence to appropriate Heanor church. See Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward IV Henry VI, 1467–1477, p. 479. It's possible, I guess, that this is why the area got to be seen as a new royal forest. Not sure how long Edward IV's forest lasted, or even whether the project actually got off the ground, but I can imagine any population clearances or oppressive restrictions making a big impact at so late a date, when forest law was in steep decline. I feel a bit impertinent mentioning this because, although I was educated nearby and worked for several years right next to the Forest, I never thought at the time to do any serious research on the subject and am a complete neophyte on Nottingham local history. Sjwells53 (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]