Talk:Foresight (futures studies)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikiprojects

Tags duplicated from Futurology pending a merger discussion. --Yamara ✉ 17:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate tone tag

Instances of weasel words, peacock terms, and casual speech can be found throughout the article. --Yamara ✉ 17:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Future studies was merged with Futurology in January 2008; this article seems to come under the same issue, and is being discussed on the Talk:Futurology page. --Yamara ✉ 17:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think Foresight claims to be a tool rather than a general topic, and I propose we rewrite this article, with a lot of pruning involved. Classical geographer (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool? No, Strategic Foresight, Futures Studies, and Futurology are all three distinct but related schools of thought. Merged? Okay, but the differences need to be explained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.185.12.208 (talk) 21:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was against a merger of this article with the other ones, on the assumption that Foresight (Analysis?) is more of a tool, and Future Studies and Futurology a school of thought. If they are all different schools of thought, I am also in favour of merging them, of course. If you are an expert, 210.185.12.208, then please feel free! Classical geographer (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technology foresight should not be merged because it is a topic of its own belonging to the field of science and technology policy where research foresight and technology foresight are specific methods for looking over the horizon five to seven years hence to identify new and emerging technologies and come up with possible advise to government and other agencies as to priorities in science and technology /innovation/ policy agendas. Quite anumber of countries have had and some still have S&T foresight units. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.168.109 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 22 November 2008

And quite some countries have Ministries of Agriculture, yet that doesn't say anything about the general topic of agriculture, does it? Classical geographer (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foresight and Scenario Planning

dear colleagues, will you explain to me, what the differences between the foresight and scenario planning? Vip (talk) 09:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foresight describes the discipline, while scenario planning is a tool or method used within the discipline of foresight. Foresight may also include methods such as horizon scanning, roadmapping, trend research. Foresight is therefore not restricted to the method of scenario planning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.195 (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small changes made by Foresight student

I am a student in the M.S. in Foresight program at the University of Houston and I made these following changes on this article -

I added for field practice and study context - The foresight of futures studies is also known as strategic foresight. this foresight used by and describing professional futurists trained in Master's programs is the research-driven practice of exploring expected and alternative futures and guiding futures to inform strategy. Foresight includes understanding the relevant recent past; scanning to collect insight about present, futuring to describe the understood future including trend research; environment research to explore possible trend breaks from developments on the fringe and other divergencies that may lead to alternative futures; visioning to define preferred future states; designing strategies to craft this future; and adapting the present forces to implement this plan. There is notable but not complete overlap between foresight and strategic planning, change management, forecasting, and design thinking.

I also edited the 2nd bullet point to make clear the difference between normative and application foresight practitioners - debate and for some futurists who are normative and focus on action driven by their values who may be concerned with effort to create wider participatory democracy. Foresight is a set of competencies and not a value system, however.

- Joe Murphy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Murphy SF (talk • contribs) 06:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foresight (futures studies). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209233320/http://forlearn.jrc.es/index.htm to http://forlearn.jrc.es/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]