Talk:Ford Ranger

Automobiles High‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trucks Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Proposed merge of Ford Ranger EV into Ford Ranger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a EV version of the Ford Ranger Qwv (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The FREV article seems like it has a lot of extra content but I don't see a big issue with keeping it stand alone. Springee (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Merge Ford Ranger EV is in a similar context to Chevrolet S-10 EV and Toyota RAV4 EV; on top of that, merging it would clutter up the Ford Ranger (Americas) article too much. -SteveCof00 (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for reasons mentioned above. RickyCourtney (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There's enough unique content in the EV article that I think it would overwhelm the main Ranger article. The vehicle itself is divergent enough from the standard Ranger that I think readers looking for information on either one would be better served by keeping the articles separate. --Sable232 (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.