Talk:For Her Sake (1911 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have this to you soon JAGUAR 22:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

The leads needs to be expanded slightly to summarise the article. There is nothing on what critics thought about the film in the lead
"is a 1911 American silent short war romance film" - a lot of overlinking here. "Short" can be unlinked at least
"His rival becomes a Union officer and are reunited when the Confederate is captured" - Confederate is captured sounds vague. Also, does it have to be capitalised or not?
I would recommend splitting plot and production into two sections
Can reception be expanded? Are there any more reviews out there?

On hold

As it's very understandable that information is scarce for a 104 year old lost film, this article is at 30k (651 words) of readable prose too short to promote. Again, the major concern here is that there are only two references! I can't promote an article with this little, so addition of more sources would be great. Are there any more secondary sources that were used for previous Thanhouser articles suitable for this one? For an article this size, a bare minimum of five sources would suffice. I'll have to leave this on hold until more content/sources are added. Other than that, I recognise it's a short review. 22:31, 19 September 2015‎ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaguar (talk • contribs)

@Jaguar: - going to dig some more up if I can. Going to need an extension. Other fixes done though. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar and ChrisGualtieri:GA Hold status for one month — any updates on status here? — Cirt (talk) 17:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just waiting for Chris to come up with a few more secondary sources - after that it should be good to go. JAGUAR 13:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar and ChrisGualtieri:GA Hold status for one more week since above status check -- any new updates? — Cirt (talk) 15:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not GA at this time

Unfortunately, it looks like ChrisGualtieri hasn't edited Wikipedia in about one month.

Closing this one as not GA at this time.

Can always be renominated later and ChrisGualtieri could request Jaguar to do an expedited review at that point in time -- based upon this review. Or ask the same of a different GA Reviewer.

Good luck,

— Cirt (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]