Talk:Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification

Football: Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

CONCACAF qualifying

@Matilda Maniac: The CONCACAF qualifying is split the way it is because the play-off between the second and third place teams was not part of the W Championship. Please do not combine them. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure ! This is just a result of someone reverting an edit without leaving any form of Edit summary, which is required. Matilda Maniac (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Matilda Maniac: Edit summaries are not required. When your edit was reverted, your replacement of the exact same content can be seen as attempted WP:OWNership of the article. If an edit is reverted, discussion on the talk page is warranted. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think the policy around WP:BRD can be much clearer: "When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed." Someone who reverts my good faith edits without bothering to leave a reason is being rude. Also, note that the article is structured sorted by Federation rather than time. Otherwise the playoff would go elsewhere (after the CAF section?). But several years of experience at Wikipedia has made me recognize that the editors at Olympic and World Cup article are far more impassioned than with other articles, so I will direct my attentions elsewhere. Matilda Maniac (talk) 00:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]