Talk:Fool for Love (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

Television: Buffyverse / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Buffyverse task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes

Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.

Was Fool for Love or Darla aired first?

The article said "'Darla', first aired earlier the same night" (emphasis mine). I don't remember directly (I'm not sure I was even watching back then), but wasn't Buffy airing before Angel at this point (season 5 of Buffy at 8:00, season 2 of Angel at 9:00)? That suggests Fool for Love aired before Darla. A few online sources (though none too reliable) confirm that order. So I'm changing a few pages to reflect that. If I'm wrong, please correct me, and at least we'll have this "conversation" to refer to later in case someone else gets the same idea. :) Pages affected: Fool for Love (Buffy episode), Darla (Angel episode), List of Angel episodes --Renophaston 18:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you're right, "Fool for Love" was first. --Nalvage 20:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Section

In this episode, Angelus, while already re-ensouled hadn't chose yet to call himself Angel. --Gonzalo84 20:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy507.jpg

Image:Buffy507.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Spike 70s.gif

The image Image:Spike 70s.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record

Blow by blow recounting of the episodes violates copyright...so I deleted the expanded overview. Lots42 (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently...

The current article is crammed full with speculation and original research. Lots42 (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been watching these again in order (along with Angel, as aired) and find that the discrepancy between the previously spoken origins of Spike's names in contrast to what is shown here is not necessarily a "continuity violation" and it's inclusion reflects the personal opinion of one who wrote it. Many times in history there is an accepted story behind something that has been often repeated to the point of being accepted as fact only to find out later through advances in science, research, or unveiled documentation that the accepted fact was wrong or misinformed. A continuity violation would be something that directly contradicts already established continuity but a person recanting hearsay does not fall under this as it had never been shown to be accurate. Should someone disagree, feel free to discuss. Chance X74 (talk) 11:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whirlwind?

“

Along with "Becoming, Part One", "Darla" and "The Girl in Question", this is one of only four Buffyverse episodes in which all four members of the Whirlwind (Angel, Spike, Darla and Drusilla) appear.

”

When were they given the name "Whirlwind"? —Tamfang (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the Angel episode "Darla", originally aired directly after this Buffy episode. 82.139.86.180 (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]