Talk:Folk dances of Assam
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Folk dances of Assam was copied or moved into Ali Ai Ligang with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Lead
[edit]Most of the lead had nothing to do with "Folk Dances of Assam". It was full of peacock terms and puffery. I removed and reworded it to be more encyclopedic. GrainyMagazine (talk) 04:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]Bagurumba should not have its own page. The content is just copied from this page. Same goes for Bihu dance. GrainyMagazine (talk) 04:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't agree. There are many folk dances of Assam. Bihu and Bagurumba are different folk dances from Assam. Bagurumba deserves it own page. Chaipau (talk) 12:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Problem with reference 3
[edit]It looks like this is supposed to be citing the image, but it appears as a straggled ref. Can someone look at this, I'm not sure what to do with it. Fireflo (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Folk dances of Assam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121128042429/http://assam.gov.in/culture.asp to http://assam.gov.in/culture.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)