Jump to content

Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw 61

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Type query

[edit]

This machine was probably the first to take off succesfully, but is it not an "Autogyro" instead of a Helicopter?

nope - the rotors were powered. autogyros rotate by forward movement. -eric ✈ 06:09, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"First helicopter"?

[edit]

In german Wikipedia we have slightly different data - we see the first flight of the FW-61 on June 26, 1936 (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Wulf_Fw_61).

And connected to this fact we see the french "Gyroplane-Laboratoire" as "the first stable flying helicopter": http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroplane-Laboratoire

Maybe you want to consider this data for a change on this and/or connected articles.

--84.189.159.223 01:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Bernd_vdB)[reply]

First controllable helicopter?

[edit]

According to the Wikipedia entry for Helicopter: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Helicopter

"A flight of the first fully controllable helicopter was demonstrated by Raúl Pateras de Pescara 1916 in Buenos Aires, Argentina."

This seems to contradict the claim that the Fw61 was the first fully controlable helicopter. Both entries can't be right...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.128.91 (talk • contribs)

Born2flie: That section of the Helicopter article has been edited. --18:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I added a few internal links, some of which might help in researching this subject, but I can't add anything to the debate about whether this was the first (fully controllable) helicopter or not. There must be aviation buffs out there (especially rotary-wing) who can expand this article. Hurrmic 19:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

Born2flie: Several references refer to the helicopter as a Focke-Achgelis design, the Fa 61[1][2] or the Model 61. --19:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as far as I can tell, while the 61 was designed by both Focke and Achgelis, Focke-Achgelis was not incorporated until 1937. Saying that their first project was an 'official' FA design sounds like revisionist history to me. ericg ✈ 20:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Born2flie:The German article says that Focke, himself, never referred to it as the Fw 61 but simply as the F 61. I had included this in the article, but the German article is unreferenced. The German article also acknowledges that the aircraft is sometimes referred to by some sources as the Fa 61. Guess I'll keep looking for a definitive source. --01:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In German Aircraft of the Second World War, a 745-page blockbuster written by J.R. Smith and Anthony Kay this aircraft is named Focke Achgelis Fa 61 (pages 596-597) as does Smith in Focke-Wulf, an Aircraft Album on pages 98-101.Dirk P Broer (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Heli.fw-61.jpg

[edit]

Image:Heli.fw-61.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't use a fair use rationale because the image is on the Commons where fair use is not permitted. Image needs to be deleted off of the Commons and then uploaded again to Wikipedia with a fair use rationale and tag. --Born2flie 22:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the photograph display a registration number belonging to a SkyHawk from 1964 to 2015? Is it authentic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.69.172 (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thought

[edit]

Looking at the picture, I can tell you that thing is not a helicopter but rather an airplane with two propellers pointing up. I'll leave this alone for now so as to not start an edit war.12.192.132.130 (talk) 14:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think, with respect, that it is clear from the article itself that this is indeed a helicopter as defined there and here. The exact appearance of this particular machine may not be such a useful guide here, given the early stage of development that we were then at. The important thing is how it works, not how it looks. :) Best wishes. DBaK (talk) 09:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

helicopter?

[edit]

judging from the pic this is an autogyro.  Dr. Loosmark  08:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think, with respect, that it is clear from the article itself that this is indeed a helicopter as defined there and here. The exact appearance of this particular machine may not be such a useful guide here, given the early stage of development that we were then at. The important thing is how it works, not how it looks. :) Best wishes. DBaK (talk) 09:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The cut-down 'propeller' on the front is acting merely as an engine cooling fan - the engine also drives both rotors which are powered all the time, making it a 'proper' helicopter, which is why it was able to hover inside the sports stadium. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.64.88 (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Focke-Wulf Fw 61. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw 61/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Born2flie: First, truly viable helicopter, whether or not it was the first "fully controllable" helicopter. It deserves a better treatment. --18:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Focke-Wulf Fw 61. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Focke-Wulf_Fw_61&oldid=1207255828"