Talk:Flyers–Penguins rivalry

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by Philadelphia Flyers task force.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Incredibly biased

This was obviously written by a Flyers fan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.151.228 (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this pretty biased to say the least 108.17.94.14 (talk) 06:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What in particular do you think is biased? --Izzygood (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010 season

The information about the Flyers winning their second round playoff series during their Cinderella march to the 2010 Stanley Cup Finals is relevant information. The Penguins being eliminated in their second round series in the 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs is also relevant info. Both are not redundant. The only reason why I want to keep this information in is because the Flyers didn't have to worry about facing the Penguins in the playoffs and it made their run to the Finals much easier. – SNIyer12, (talk), 15:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is an incredibly ridiculous statement, hence why I kept removing that text. You have no way of justifying that statement, nor does the outcome of the 2010 playoffs factor into the rivalry simply because the teams did not play each other. Darthflyer (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

article name change

Why was this article's name changed with no prior discussion? I feel it should be changed back to Battle of Pennsylvania, or at least discussed first. ChakaKong^talk 16:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]