Talk:Florida's 18th congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florida's 18th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2014 and 2016 elections

No mentioon of the two most recent elections? ??? What am I missing? Jamesdowallen (talk) 08:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SSDI denied rorschach SConnected vetetan.

You may not be representing my district but you may be able to help. I request a Congrssional Inquiry into the malpractice of the Social Security Administration. I have been denied several times and each appeal was won except the administrative judge would not override his colleague even when I and my lawyer made a case for disability. They claim the first judge did well and failed to recognize any disability. It was not the point in an appeal. I beg to differ. My disabilities don't go away because an admin. Judge says the process was followed. Point blank, they are "timing me out". They waste years in appeal of nothing tangible. Then claim I am am not eligible because I could not work through years of disability. I couldn't believe the twisted logic. I get Service Connected VA disability. I cannot do what I have done for my Country. I am supposed to be on a "fast track" for SSDI. They fast tracked me to the garbage can. Why can't they accept the opinions of govt. certified VA doctors? Instead they use paid "Quacks" at Urgent Med shops who diagnose anything that is not even close to what we file a claim for. What is going on?

In short, I filed a claim, years ago for my MDD and Ptsd. I was sent to a quack who analyzed whether I could stand, sit, stoop, reach or bend. NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PROVEN DISABILITY! Since then I have tried to present evidence of my physical disabilities. Arthritis, bursitis and plethora ailments that are lifelong and debilitating. Social Security will not consider the disabilities they analyzed because the only time they recognize why I filed is when then deny benefits. I physically and mentally cannot do the shit work that they themselves agreed I cannot do. Even Morgan and Morgan won't touch the case. Admin. judges should trained ned or abolished. It's not right to clear your docket after years of suffering just so the docket is clear for the period of 5 or ten years ago. Merry Christmas! You get a bonus for not doing a good job but your docket cleared off a bunch of cases that really should matter.

Don't you know that the COLA was predicted by retailers and they already raised their prices but 13%. They robbed us even before the raise! That's what I have to say and request. Now I'm going to the Media. Iraq doesn't deserve Billions Americans do. It's our money. Bring that up with real action and you'll never lose an election. Sincerely, Carroll H Clark III 2601:58B:4801:9510:A18B:2E66:2279:CCD0 (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]