Talk:Florence Mills House

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Still NRHP?

I know this site has been delisted as an NHL, but is it still on the NRHP? If so, the delisted=___ parameter should be removed from the infobox. See Template:Infobox nrhp2/doc for more information. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was both de-designated as an NHL and delisted from the NRHP. The [http://www.nps.gov/nr/listings/20090130.HTM weekly listing announcement covering it states:

NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY,

Mills, Florence, House,

220 W. 135th St.,

New York,  76001244, NHL

WITHDRAWAL OF DESIGNATION/REMOVED, 1/16/09

which i think verifies it was both withdrawn and removed. That is definitive, actually. Sorry about being vague about this, elsewhere. Thanks for pointing it out here as an issue, now fully resolved in my view. doncram (talk) 23:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]