Jump to content

Talk:Florence Farr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeFlorence Farr was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 27, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 27, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 17, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Untitled

[edit]

Add more here in a few. Zos 15:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sifting through "Women of the Golden Dawn" today for more info. - JMax555 15:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah i just got very busy on the personal level, so any citations to keep thi from being deleted is good. I've had two bios deleted in the last week or so because the person wasnt notable enough for other readers. Zos 15:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
She's had a book biography published, and her connections with Shaw and Yeats certainly make her notable -- she figures prominently in their collected letters. I suppose we could get editors of the Shaw and Yeats articles to check in if there's any issues about it. - JMax555 16:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Add her link to their pages using wiki links. That way they can come if they want. Zos
I did so with Yeats' article , but Shaw's is locked down over disputes at the moment. - JMax555 17:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha tell me this...what article isnt under dispute! I mean, as of right now, we are editing Golden Dawn pages and people who were in disputes in the Golden Dawn, and us getting into disputes about all of this! Will history ever teach us?!?! Zos 18:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and by the way, if you bring disputers from the shaw page over here, I'll stop helping you on articles! (just kidding) heh. Zos 18:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub removed

[edit]

I have removed the stub notice from this article. It is now a very good article and I would suggest putting it forward for Peer Review. Capitalistroadster 13:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


New Material

[edit]

I've added extra material I found in the catalog of the University College of London biographical collection. The biography and listing of the sources can be found on the Web at: http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/frames/fulldesc?coll_id=1772&inst_id=13 JMax555 07:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been adding more material and citations, and trying to polish the text structure and syntax, to get the article ready for peer review and hopefully elevated in rating. There's a new book coming out next year from Oxford University Press called "The Last Minstrels" about Yeats' and Farr's efforts to promote Irsih lyrical theatre, which should supply some more info about that period of Farr's life. JMax555 09:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the inactive infoboxes from article. JMax555 03:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm arranging to view Bax's "Collected Letters" of Farr, Shaw and Yeats, since I've found that the University of California-Berkeley has copies on file (but only viewable in the library.) They also have copies of other books about Farr, including some already cited, so I will be able to make better cites with page numbers in a week of so. JMax555 16:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A-class

[edit]

I've closed the A-class review because it's been three months with only one support. DrKiernan (talk) 08:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAN review

[edit]
  • Dr. Farr was known as an advocate of equal education and professional rights for women,[3] which doubtlessly influenced his daughters' attitudes in their later lives.

Should be who not which.

  • Farr, May Morris and other friends posed for Sir Edward Burne-Jones' Pre-Raphaelite painting, "The Golden Stairs" when she was 19 years old.

Fragment consider re-writing.

  • psaltery harp or psaltry harp ?
  • Yeats also lived in Bedford Park, and it's likely she first made his acquaintance when her brother-in-law was painting Yates' portrait.[2]

This sentence is awkward reading. Are Yeats and Yates the same person, and is this the his acquaintance she is meeting?

  • She continued taking minor roles at the Folly (including a performance two days after her father's death on 14 April), but changed her stage name back to Florence Farr when she began performing at the Gaiety Theatre in May.

This is a lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.

  • With her commanding presence and beautiful speaking voice (noted by Shaw), she soon attained modest success on London's West End stages, and in 1884 she married fellow actor Edward Emery

This sentence should be two - it contains two seperate ideas, and shouldn't be run on together.

  • Beginning in 1882, Farr served an eight-month apprenticeship under the actor-manager J. L. Toole at the Folly Theatre on King William IV Street near Charing Cross, originally adopting the stage name of Mary Lester (in deference to her father's wishes, who did not want the Farr name associated with the theatre.)

Should't be the actor-manager but only Farr served an eight-month apprenticeship under actor-manager - also this is a very lo-o-o-n-n-g sentence.

  • . One of her childhood friends was May Morris, the daughter of Jane Morris, the renowned Pre-Raphaelite artist's model, who introduced her to the artistic and intellectual circles of London society

Another long sentence. Who was it that introduced Farr to the circles, was it May or Jane?

  • Farr, May Morris and other friends posed for Sir Edward Burne-Jones' Pre-Raphaelite painting, "The Golden Stairs" when she was 19 years old.

This sentence could be worded the other way around - there are many she's in the sentence - is it right to assume when Farr was 19 years old, when there are many young ladies mentioned in the sentence?

  • Notes 3 does not attach to a reference. Bax (1971)
  • Note 10 King 1978, does not attach to any reference unless it should be 1977?
  • Images check out OK
  • Other names should be mentioned in the info box and introductory paragraph - Mary Lester

Next to establishing context, the lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article (e.g. when a related article gives a brief overview of the topic in question). It is even more important here than for the rest of the article that the text be accessible, and consideration should be given to creating interest in reading the whole article (see news style and summary style).

See also Better lead


GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The sources need page notations for several citations as the majority are from books. I checked out some web sites for scope, and accuracy but do not have access to these books in particular.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good luck improving the article SriMesh | talk 01:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the review. As soon as these holidays are over I'll actually have time to implement some changes! If anyone else would like to work on it before then, please do... JMax555 (talk) 01:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliographies

[edit]

Why are there two bibliographies in this article? I've never seen this in an article - shouldn't they be merged? Hohenloh + 12:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because one of them is what she published and the other one is about her. The first could be retitled Works. O Kolymbitès (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florence Farr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Florence_Farr&oldid=1207184566"