Talk:Flora Danica

A fact from Flora Danica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/July.

Wikipedia

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Do not upload images to Commons from the version digitized by the University of Copenhagen

A word of caution. Scans / photographic images of this work is in all likelihood PD under US law. However, the same is not the case under Danish law. In Denmark, such works are protected 50 years from the creation of the actual photograph. The Danish National Library of Science and Medicine (Danmarks Natur- og Lægevidenskabelige Bibliotek) [1] received government funding from the Danish Ministry of Culture for digitizing the entire work but expressly demanded that the Danish Wikipedia remove the copies of some of these illustrations that had been uploaded there. In short: the version digitized in 1998 in Copenhagen won't be PD under Danish law before 2048 unless the archive either changes its mind later or Danish law is amended. For the moment, please don't upload such images to the Wikimedia Commons. Any such images uploaded to the English Wikipedia should be expressly tagged with "Fair use" to avoid these images being copied to the Commons. Valentinian ^{T / C} 19:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora Danica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111207171149/http://www.royalcopenhagen.com/en/shop/shop-series/1/dinnerware/129/flora-danica to http://www.royalcopenhagen.com/en/shop/shop-series/1/dinnerware/129/flora-danica

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]