Talk:Floorp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Floorp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Floorp is great

I have been using this browser for a few days now, and it's really fun. Highliy productive when editing wiki. Much better than my previous browser Edge, which sucked and was intrusive. Floorp has some cool privacy features and no bloats in it. Setting the complements aside, this article relies too much on primary materials. Proper independent coverage of this browser from news pubs exist and they should be introduced instead. X (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separate page for version history

I've noticed that the version history section takes up a significant amount of the page? Should it be moved to its own page? Benpiano800 (talk) 21:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and did it per WP:BOLD Benpiano800 (talk) 15:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got reverted so I guess that's the end of that. Benpiano800 (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Benpiano800: I’ve reviewed and approved this article for WP:NPP but just wanted to leave a note that the version history section needs to be significantly reduced, as it makes the article far too long and is largely if not exclusively based on primary sources. Remember that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Perhaps instead of a table it could be more similar to other browser articles, with a few sentences about noteworthy features, like the Features section at the Google Chrome article. StewdioMACK (talk) 10:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]