Jump to content

Talk:Flemington, New Jersey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge?

[edit]

Personally, the redirect and merge seem appropriate to me. I don't see that the traffic circle would be of much interest to anyone outside the context of the town. If the amount of info about the traffic circle ever gets sufficiently high, it could of course become a seperate article again. Friday (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see there's been a little contention. Does anyone care to discuss why they think a merge is inappropriate? Friday (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
According to the traffic circle's AfD, there is a strong consensus not to have a separate article for the circle (it was almost a consensus to delete). 10 people voted to delete, 4 included merge in the votes either on their own or with an option to keep (ironically, including User:SPUI, who's been revert warring over this), and only 2 voted for a straight keep. That's a very small minority who think this circle of asphalt deserves its own article. SPUI has a history of trolling, as well. -R. fiend 02:15, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flemington, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flemington, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flemington, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak "NJ Court" article prevents objective reporting in Lindbergh case

[edit]

Because of a weak NJ Court article, it is impossible to state with any clarity that the accused was tried under state felony statute of murder. That he was tried in a municipal courthouse was just because that was the only courthouse around. The court was (most likely) impaneled under state law with state judges, not county. In the meantime, that particularly county courthouse has disappeared, absorbed by another county, another NJ mystery. Student7 (talk) 19:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Flemington,_New_Jersey&oldid=1202047853"