Talk:Flatow Amendment
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More opinions template
[edit]A Google Scholar search for "Flatow Amendment" returns several papers that offer a more critical view of the amendment. Here are a few that stood out and that could be used to expand the article and make it more neutral:
- The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Human Rights Violations: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back, 16 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 71 (1998)
- State Sponsors of Terrorism Is a Question, Not an Answer: The Terrorism Amendment to the FSIA Makes Less Sense Now Than It Did Before 9/11, 38 Tex. Int'l L.J. 119 (2003)
signed, Rosguill talk 23:06, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- Stub-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles