Talk:Flame test

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flame test article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Color Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

People asking us to do their homework for them instead of reading the article

what is the main reason for carrying out a flame test? --212.85.15.116 09:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are the inaccuracies involved in using flame tests for identification purposes? Your little chemist—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.188.172.243 (talk • contribs) 18:40, November 16, 2005 (UTC)

It can help Idenify elements in a compound. It's quick and easy. The main inaacuracies are the fact that the colours can be similar between two elements, one may mask another, to be able to see the colours some times you need large amounts of the element in the compuund --Wolfmankurd 12:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Structure suggestion

Should probably be documented in the article anyways:

The flame test is a fast, simple and easy way to detect (qualitatively) certain elements in a sample.
It only works with certain elements (generally metals)
The test depends on the ability of the chemist to recognize the color of an element (and some are similar, also forget it if you are color blind).
The element must be present in fairly large concentrations
The presence of an element can be masked by another element (hence the cobalt glass filter which is used, for instance, to detect other elements in the presence of sodium which would normally overwhelm the light).

I'll see about neatening this up and adding it to the article at some point. RJFJR 20:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

restored

anon 59.92.41.44 removed the common metals section including the pictures. I don't know if it was on purpose. I restored it. RJFJR 18:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ions only?

I thought that the flame test could only be carried out on metallic cations, not normal elements. I was going to edit references to "metals" to "Metallic Ions" but I wanted to check with the communitity beforehand. 202.173.128.90 09:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, an explaination of the chemical side of the test should be added; that the reason for the emittion of light is caused by electrons in the element being given energy from the flame, raising the electrons to a set higher energy level, and by returning from the higher energy level to the original energy level, the extra energy is given off as electron-magnetic radition, causing the change of colour in the flame by radiation in the light spectrum. (general explaination, needs a lot of work) 202.173.128.90 09:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

add, the fact that the colour of the wave depends on energy of the photon it's wavelength/frequency, depends on the size of the jump made by the electron, depends on the element --Wolfmankurd 12:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a link to Emission spectrum for the physical chemistry side, don't think this needs more Todd.Dembrey 19:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Test Description

Rifleman 82 has introduced a section 'Test' to replace a section removed by me for WP:NOT violations. I believe that this section (as well as the one I removed) is redundant, and doesn't add to the article - I believe that enough information is conveyed in this sentence from the first paragraph:

It involves introducing a sample to a flame, and observing the colour that results. Samples are often held on the looped end of a clean, nonreactive wire or on the tip of a wood stirring stick soaked in water.

This new section can also be read as directly contradicting the previous paragraph - 'does not require any special equipment' could be either:

No equipment is needed that isnt normally found in a chem lab ; or
Is doable with equipment a lay person could have

I think the second definition is what most people are likely to read it as (and, it is reasonably true for the flame test - a match will do the job well enough), and that would make a bunsen certainly 'special equipment', and probably platinum wires and HCl, too. LVC 01:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're a chemist, a bunsen burner and platinum wire will not be "special equipment". A match or a wooden stick will probably give you a lot of problems from sodium contamination. I didn't catch the part on the top, I've tweaked it again. --Rifleman 82 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Periodic table?

Would it add to the table to include the column in the periodic table? I'd imagine that relates to the emission color. —Ben FrantzDale 00:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

This article really needs pictures of the diffrent tests. One persons mauve is anothers violet so the description can be a bit accurate. Even an emmision spectrum could help. Could someone think about this because i just dont have the time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.129.92 (talk) 09:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC) hdrtnthfffftye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.190.66.59 (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected vandalism?

I've cut Also, when most of the chemicals are put in rubbing oil it makes a darker light. which looked suspiciously nonsensical to me (and I'm shocked that it'd been on the page since 18 September 2008, surviving many edits). It was added by User:Jordaniswoo, whose few edits all seem to have been vandalism, so I feel fairly confident that it's trash: if anyone knows better, feel free, as always, to revert! Kay Dekker (talk) 15:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnesium

I swear I've change this one before. Magnesium ions do not give a colour with a flame test. The photon of light produced is outside the visible spectrum. For some reason it keeps being put in here as "bright white". Magnesium metal does burn with a bright white flame, but a flame test onm a magnesium salt does NOT give any colour, least of all a "bright" one. Fork me (talk) 10:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mislabeling

Several elements on the list titled "Common metals" are nonmetals. 88.196.238.207 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I noticed that too. Have made the wording more generic throughout. 212.240.194.162 (talk) 07:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree need pictures

The colors listed seem to be incorrect at least for common ions. Calcium is listed as "brick red" yet I (as Lab TA) see it as orange and CRC Handbook lists it as orange-red (Calcium emission lines extend into yellow, our lab analyzed Calcium in Concrete using an AA and some Calcium lines are close to Sodium D lines at 589 nm). Perhaps this is through Cobalt glass? That should be noted.

Pyrotechnic colorant lists Calcium as Orange: lines at "most intense: 591–599 nm and 603–608 nm".

I worked for a demolitions company that also put on fireworks shows. Barium is not pale green and Boron is not dark green, those are reversed. Looking at emission lines of these metals/metalloids in CRC Handbook or Perkins Elmer Atomic Absorbtion instrument manual or specific Hollow Cathode Lamp emission lines list (absorption lines are complementary to emission lines) or Astronomical emission line list that these are incorrect. Note that AA Instruments can be operated in emission as well as absorption modes.

There was a confusion with source material. Flame emission requires a volatile (stable) sample. A metal salt solution is generally used. (I change references from "Sodium metal" and "Calcium metal" in another article.) Although Copper wire oxidizes in a flame and the relatively volatile Copper(I) Oxide provides some color, the more volatile Copper(I)Chloride creates a stronger color. (See reference to Scientific American article on creating a Copper Laser for high temperature stability of Copper(I)Chloride.) Boron salts (e.g. Boric Acid) are a weak green unless wetted with alcohol which forms the more volatile alcoholates (B(MeO)₃). I'd note that Strontium Nitrate is the Colorant used in road flares (containing Strontium Nitrate and Magnesium metal).

Although Flame test may be done in any flame, luminous flames (e.g. containing significant carbon) cause interference. Flame tests are also affected by flame temperature (Adiabatic flame temperature)

In theory the emitting moiety is the metal ion in the hotter oxidizing portion of the flame. --Shjacks45 (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant inconsistency

The table says the flame for Zinc is colourless, but the picture beside it suggests otherwise. What colour is blue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.40.146 (talk) 13:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flame test? Materials? WHERE TO GET THEM?

hey guys i am a junior at a Waldorf school in Cali and im performing a flame test tomorrow. i need to know where to buy the different materials for different colored flames and how to acquire them. PLEASE HELP! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.166.7.207 (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calcium

Isn't calcium brick red as opposed to orange? At least according to this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.18.78.93 (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A few

Link. Double sharp (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Math

1+1+1+1=4 41.233.166.7 (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 7 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dorsanil, Difei Shi (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ccustodi, Ezpzii, CrayfishClarinetist, Melikajvn.

— Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical Testing

Hi, I'm quite new here and am trying to work on cleaning up and improving the chemical testing article (More so how it looks than the content, I am by no means an expert in the field). Would you recommend taking an image from this article or would that be too niche. Thank you. Azure Sea Cobalt Sky (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon

The reason carbon shows an orange flame is due to black body radiation, which is different from the color mechanism of other elements, so I am not sure if it should be included in the flame test. I have currently removed it but you may revert it if I have made a mistake. Pygos (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iron (II), Iron (III), Copper (I), and Copper(II))

It makes sense to me that different valences of metal atoms should produce different emission spectra (and thus flame color),but I am unsure if the elements will stay in their particular oxidation state in flames. And as the colors of different iron or copper species suggest, their flame colors vary little between oxidation states. So perhaps we should merge these flame colors. Pygos (talk) 06:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]