Talk:Flame angelfish
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem
[edit]This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Inappropriate material for this subtopic
[edit]The text of this subtopic does NOT provide a "species description"; it is merely more information about these fish in aquaria. It needs to be completely replaced, and the material currently in this section moved to the section about aquaria. (I would've done it myself, but that would've left "Species description" blank altogether [which might have been the better option at this point.) philiptdotcom (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
"In aquaria" section needs to be moved to end of article
[edit]"In aquaria" section needs to be moved to end of article: it is NOT the main subject of an article with this title. The article itself is supposed to be about the flame angelfish, not "the flame angelfish in aquaria." Species description, range, etc. should be first. philiptdotcom (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Needs to have a section about the SOURCE of flame angelfishes in commercial trade
[edit]Needs to have a section about the SOURCE of flame angelfishes in commercial trade: The vast majority of flame angelfish are wild-collected, (by definition) degrading the ecosystems from which they are taken. I believe (but am not sure) that this is one of the few marine fish species that has been bred in captivity. Information about this aspect of flame angelfish in aquaria needs to be added (with peer-reviewed references) by someone who knows the details. philiptdotcom (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)