Talk:Fitzhugh Lee

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fitzhugh Lee article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Governors Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Military / Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Memorials / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

One of three former Confederates...

The line states, Lee was one of three former Confederate generals to be made major generals in the U.S. Army. I do not doubt this but I was wondering who the third officer is after Fitz. Lee and Joseph Wheeler? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.133.186 (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the air means what?

The article currently contains the words Lee's reconnaissance found that the Union Army's right flank was "in the air". What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.214.66 (talk) 01:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exposed and vulnerable to attack, possibly surprise attack because of its dispositions and surrounding terrain. Donner60 (talk) 02:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about that shad dinner?

Someone has somehow neglected to mention that little incident where our porcine hero lost Petersburg and hence the war because he and Pickett disappeared to gorge on shad while the battle of Five Forks was getting underway. This good ol' boy looks considerably better-fed then your typical Confeddy enlisted man, who would have been lucky to find a cricket to swallow in the week to come. Overall, one expensive fish entree, I would say.68.178.50.46 (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any reliable sources that you can cite to this effect?
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fitzhugh Lee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208215607/http://www.generalsandbrevets.com/sgd/daniel.htm to http://www.rocemabra.com/~roger/tagg/generals/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]