Jump to content

Talk:First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

According to the FAS, this group had only a few dozen members, as of 2003. An organization that small can hardly be said to have both a "political wing" and a "military wing": it's clearly just one tiny group of people (tinier still, after recent arrests [1]), and GRAPO and the PCE(r) are clearly a single entity. -- Karada 20:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The articles ought to be separate. All claims as to the size of clandestine organizations might be disputed, but 2003 numbers cannot be the defining issue. GRAPO did play a role during the latter years of the Franco regime, and the PCE(r) and GRAPO are both significant to have separate articles. --Soman 12:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total neutrality failure...

[edit]

This article is an aberration. All sources are hostile to the subject, the language is biased, there is much SYNTH and OR speculation, soem of the claims are not verifiable, and terms such as "band" are clearly not neutral. Perhpas only the few lines in the intro are neutraly presented, but then they are not sourced... can't win! We surely can make a better job of this world shattering topic. ;) Thanks! --Cerejota (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maoist group

[edit]

It is not a maoist group.

this is much more acurate:

Comunismo, socialismo marxismo-leninismo, antirrevisionismo

For doing this crap it is better to copy&paste the spanish one — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.120.36.244 (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link sourcing GRAPO being labeled as terrorist according to The UE does, not work. A valid link must be found or the mention withdrawn.--Lembeye (talk) 18:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]