Talk:First Presbyterian Church (Hastings, Minnesota)

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warren H. Hayes association? seems no

It was once claimed in the article, very specifically, that architect Warren H. Hayes was the architect of the building. This claim was removed recently by editor Elkman. The current references then, and now, don't seem to support the claim. Including after correction of one url to changed url http://www.minneapolismn.gov/hpc/landmarks/hpc_landmarks_warren_howard_hayes.

The claim appeared in the article by this version from 2008, last edit by Appraiser. In the next edit i wikilinked the architect, and then I started the architect article, including with transfer/copying of the assertion and its wording over to the new Warren H. Hayes article, in the very first edit of that article. The Warren H. Hayes article has since been extensively developed, but the assertion remained until now.

I currently find the same assertion with same wording at http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/warren-h-hayes/works.html. Not sure if that site is a copy of, or partly derivative of, a version of the Warren H. Hayes article from wikipedia.

I guess the claim looks wrong; I am agreeing with Elkman's removal. I am removing it also from the NRHP infobox in this article. I am now removing it also from the Warren H. Hayes article, with edit summary pointing to this Talk page. --do ncr am 01:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]