Talk:First Battle of Sha'ir

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Battle of Sha'ir article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article First Battle of Sha'ir, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ISIS no capture 15 tanks

on photos uploading by ISIS are visible only two T-62, one artillery piece, two BM-21 and a destroyed BMP-1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWh7pLxEs_w http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d31_1405886660

That's just the ISIS claim and the victory is just who finally take the position in conflict (The gas camp) the "battle" was for the control of the camp so is the Syrian army who won there --Pototo1 (talk) 02:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, per Wikipedia's policy its not up to us to decide who wins or who doesn't win based on our personal POV what's a victory (that's called Original Research and strictly prohibited). Second, per Wikipedia's policy youtube and other video-related sites are strictly prohibited as sources. Third, the two sides had two different stated goals. The Army's stated goal was to recapture the field, the ISIS's stated goal was to damage the facility and capture the military arsenal. Both sides claimed they achieved these goals so both sides claim victory and per Wikipedia's policy on neutrality, both sides POV need to be presented. So please do not remove sourced information. Thank you! EkoGraf (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The battle was for the control of the Gas camp no for these 15 tanks who no exist. The Syrian Army win because they regain the control of that.

According with ISIS videos / Photos only were capture two tanks no 15 --Pototo1 (talk) 01:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Videos and photos can not be used as sources per Wikipedia policy Pototo1, I told you this before, so continually pointing to them won't achieve anything. And simply saying the battle was for control of the camp and not the tanks (which is contrary to the sources) and that the army won because they got control of it is Original Research on your part (some of it unsourced). I will repeat again, per the sources, both sides claim they achieved their goals, so per Wikipedia policy on neutrality and sticking to sources we need to present both sides views. Also, your comments that the only goal in war is to capture territory is incorrect. Its one of multiple goals in war. EkoGraf (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, one's own personal analysis of a video is not usable as a source for any claim. See Original Research and Synthesis policies for the specifics as to why that is. As for who "won", that too is a matter of interpretation, so is not appropriate unless the source says so (again, Synthesis). The outcome of the battle was that the Syrians re-took the field and ISIS left: battle over, so I've tweaked the infobox to say just what is specifically confirmed by the source. Electric Wombat (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Outcome" Edit War

First, please stop edit warring over this. See WP:3RR which is close to being breached here. Second, hold your discussions here, not in the Edit Summary field. You both have opinions and something to say to the other, so do that here. The article won't suffer if "the wrong outcome" is listed for a day or so while you discuss it like rational people. Thank you. Electric Wombat (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on First Battle of the Shaer gas field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151222105908/http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/2/8/106633/World/Region/Battle-for-Syria-gas-field-after-jihadists-execute.aspx to http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/2/8/106633/World/Region/Battle-for-Syria-gas-field-after-jihadists-execute.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on First Battle of the Shaer gas field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]