Talk:First Amendment Coalition

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move jonkerz ♠ 13:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

California First Amendment Coalition → First Amendment Coalition — The California First Amendment Coalition changed its name to First Amendment Coalition in 2009. DebEditor (talk) 21:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reason for investigating a move, certainly, but I'm afraid it's no reason for proposing one. The question is: What do people call it now? See Wikipedia:official names for an explanation of the official Wikipedia policy on this. Then see whether there's a case to be made for a move in terms of the policy. Andrewa (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a technicality. I disagree, in that it is a reason for proposing a move. In fact, I wouldn't have even bothered opening a discussion about such a move. A quick and dirty hypothetical proof of this is that if the proposer had moved it, your reason given above would not be reason enough to revert it, IMHO. Int21h (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Amendment Coalition is the official name of the organization and according to Wikipedia:official names "Where an undisputed official name exists:

   * It should always be given early in the article introduction. It should be bolded at its first mention and, where appropriate, italicised. See Wikipedia:Lead section.
   * If the official name differs from the article name, then there should be a redirect from the official name to the article."

The text in the body of the article has already been edited to reflect the new official name. I'm not sure I fully understand the question regarding "what people call it now." People may still know it as California First Amendment Coalition, which is why it requires a redirect so that people who still search for it (FAC) by its former name (CFAC) will be forwarded to the page titled First Amendment Coalition. --DebEditor (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be titled by the most common and easily identified name for the topic. If an organization changes its official name, but users are more likely to be looking for it under the old name, the article should remain at the old name. That's what was being referred to with "what people call it now." Propaniac (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support move - per naming guidelines listed above. C.f., with how we handled Myanmar/Burma. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to lack of opposition. Propaniac (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support prima facie Int21h (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blatant advertisement

This entry reads like it was copied directly from the organization's mission statement.74.134.128.175 (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]