Talk:Fireball Ministry

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Untitled

I love the band, but this page blows. It's so damn flawed. I'm too lazy to do it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.179.65 (talk • contribs)

Well, on behalf of FM fans everything, thanks for letting us know ;) Deizio 15:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability questions

Having difficulty seeing how this meets WP:BAND? Doesn't look like the albums are on notable labels, and Googling doesn't turn up any non-trivial press that I can find. Are there any sources besides the band and label's site that can be used to verify what's written here? Seraphimblade 20:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure which version of WP:MUSIC you're looking at, how well you know the band or the google results you turned up but the notability here is beyond question. FM have toured extensively worldwide, been featured in notable compilations and video games in addition to their album releases. Liquor and Poker Music is home to several notable bands. I'll see if I have better luck digging up sources.Deizio talk 16:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced both the notability and primary sources tags. Primary sources are still the only ones cited-it's really not appropriate to remove that one until some secondary sources are actually cited. Also, the primary notability criterion is also satisfied only by multiple non-trivial source mentions. If they're that big, I'm sure such exist, but I'm sure not finding them! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 03:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the notability tag is a little excessive given how many of the secondary indicators they demonstrably satisfy. However, if we don't have rules, we have chaos so I defend to the death your reasoning for tagging. And we now have an MTV feature and another source. If anything else turns up I'll add it, hopefully we can move on now. Deizio talk 10:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, got secondary sources, and that's what's needed for notability too, so certainly support the tag removal this time! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 10:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fmfmep.png

Image:Fmfmep.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Secondgreatawakening.albumart.jpg

Image:Secondgreatawakening.albumart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Theirrockisnot.albumart.jpg

Image:Theirrockisnot.albumart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fireballministrypromo.jpg

Image:Fireballministrypromo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]