Talk:Fiorano GT Challenge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fiorano GT Challenge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fiorano GT Challenge. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fiorano GT Challenge at the Reference desk.

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United Arab Emirates: Abu Dhabi Low‑importance

	United Arab Emirates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Abu Dhabi.

Untitled

Welcome to the Emotion Coaster discussion page!

Should this article be deleted?

Pdcook said that the Emotion Coaster Article should be deleted, because he/she thinks there is no need for an article for a hypothetical roller coaster. I disagree with this idea, because on the Ferrari World video and on webcams it does show it. So, what do you think? Theguywhohatestwitter (talk) 23:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome to remove the prod tag as per Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. There is certainly precedence for roller coasters having their own pages (such as Millennium Force), but I am concerned that Emotion Coaster is just in the design or planning phase and if that is the case it probably doesn't meet Wikipedia's threshold for inclusion as a stand-alone article. If it is indeed real, I would be satisfied if you can provide a couple of 3rd party references (the Ferrari World website doesn't seem to mention it) that discuss it as such. Pdcook (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiorano GT Challenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69UnAzeRN?url=http://brisbanetimes.drive.com.au/motor-news/ferraris-200kmh-rollercoaster-20100317-qden.html to http://brisbanetimes.drive.com.au/motor-news/ferraris-200kmh-rollercoaster-20100317-qden.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]