Jump to content

Talk:Finetooth shark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I have reviewed this article for GA and have made some copy edits. Please feel free to revert any copy edits with which you do not agree. I think this is a fine article and fulfills the GA criteria. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC) GA review (see here for criteria)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): follows MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused on topic and presents in context
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Another good article by you. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 18:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]