Talk:Fine print/Archives/2014
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Fine print. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
We should undo this edit. I don't think that is spam advertising Truth in Advertising (TINA.org), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization's The Law of Fine Print page because it is totally relevant to the topic at hand, from start to end, not to mention it's from a not-for-profit. WTF? Apart from User:Shortride's contribution (and noting User:Jac16888's valid spamvertising reverts) I can't see a single net edit to the article since my last edit last year that's worth keeping. User:Ronz' edit makes no sense, and misapplies policy, though Ronz' comment at User:TINA4truth is good. --{{U|Elvey}} (t•c) 21:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- I removed multiple external links after reviewing them all, hence the edit summary of " quick cleanup per WP:EL & WP:NOTLINK".
- I didn't see anything in those external links that couldn't be incorporated into the article. --Ronz (talk) 21:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)