Jump to content

Talk:Final Resolution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Konnan

[edit]

If he is inactive, will he still be with LAX at ringside?Freebird Jackson 18:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of right now, yes. If he isn't there at the PPV (and with him getting surgery, I doubt he will be) then that will be removed. TJ Spyke 23:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Poster

[edit]

here--72.186.88.137 (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kim vs Kong

[edit]

It was just announced on TNA iMPACT that the Kim v Kong match at Final Resolution would be for the title, and would be no Disqualification. (71.96.137.169 (talk) 02:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

TNA Final resolution ultimate x match

[edit]

Under all the main match headlines, you have written bullet points about the main features of the match. But what I don't understand is why, under the ultimate x match you failed to mention that team 3D and Brother Devine cheated, and used a ladder the reach the belt. I understand that wikipedia must remain neutral, but it is a key point to the match. It is not biased, merely the actual truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.93.7 (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It mentions that Devon used a ladder. Using a ladder isn't really "cheating", it just goes against the honor code (like when Samoa Joe would assault his tag team partner Christopher Daniels. It was unhonorable, but I don't think it was against the rules. TJ Spyke 18:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in an x division match, the code of the x division is the rules, so violating those rules is classed as cheating. Oh, and please stop quoting tna history at me, I could practically write the book. Although if you know of any wrestlers coming into tna, returns, jobbers, company transfers, ect, please post on a tna wikipedia for me to see.

And I've just checked, it dosn't mention the ladder anywhere. So not only were MMG & black machismo cheated out of the belt, not to mention the rest of the X division, wikipedia documents it that they lost! I hardly call that a neutral point of veiw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.89.249 (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's an honor code, not TNA rules. Also, MMG and Lethal did lose the match and that is fact. It doesn't matter if Team 3D/Devine cheated or not, they won the match and so we document them. To say they were cheated in not a neutral point of view (especially if you have no source that using a ladder in the match was against the match rules). TJ Spyke 00:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Top of page mistake

[edit]

At the top of the page, it says It is noted as one of TNA's most important pay-per-view events, as it occurs at the beginning of the year, and has delivered some high profile matches. Yet, there are no sources that confirm that from what I can find and so I am deleting it. If there are any sources you can find, show me and you can change it back. 24.98.191.219 (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to December

[edit]

Final Resolution has moved to December, with Genesis now in January. So that means there's now two Final Resolution events for 2008 - shall we call the exisiting one "Final Resolution (January 2008)" and the new one "Final Resolution (December 2008)"? Steveweiser (talk) 12:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grammatically wrong

[edit]

In the opening paragraph, it states: "there were two Final Resolution PPV events held in 2008.". The word "were" is incorrect as the second event hasn't taken place yet. But it is referred in the past tense. PHX606 (talk) 08:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.144.200 (talk) [reply]

All Results Need Own Article

[edit]

All the results need their own article. It would make this list article a lot neater. You don't need to link twice to the results articles that are already linked to in the tabled list. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 04:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Redolution 2013

[edit]

Jeff Hardy Defeated Magnus For The WHC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.77.17.133 (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Resolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Resolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Final_Resolution&oldid=1202003371"