Talk:Final Exit Network

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Kevinbradley57 (talk · contribs)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Controversy & POV

What does this mean, "candidates are not suicidal". If candidates wish to die, even if their reasons are based on very real physical suffering, aren't they still suicidal? I think this needs to be reworded or deleted.

This should include some of the ethical controversy about Final Exit. It is a biased article. 67.244.32.123 (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed & have tagged it. With all the media attention, it should be relatively easy to call attention to that. Plenty of sources out there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.26.70 (talk)

I edited the article and believe it's unbiased now. I'd like to remove the POV tag for now. What do you think? Ewick12 (talk) 07:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've received no opposition, I have removed the POV tag. Feel free to put it back in if you think the article is biased. Ewick12 (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-- There is insufficient description of the process by which individuals seek "compassionate presence" services from Final Exit Network. I personally support Final Exit Network and I do not shy away from the fact of the various legal actions. For those who experience that comfort of having a knowledgeable person ease their suffering this service will often be seen as a real God send - bringing peace and comfort where there was pain and suffering. Please suggest wording and let's move on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dignity at end of life (talk • contribs) 21:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy & POV Revisited

I have replaced the POV tag. As examples, "intolerable," "successful," "compassionate," "self deliverance," and "not suicidal" are all weighted words or phrases designed, in context, to promote the validity of suicide as an ethical choice. The encyclopedia should not join in that promotion, but should instead restate such a position as the belief of the FEN. Moreover, I do not believe the previous issues, such as the absence of a discussion of the ethical controversy, have been addressed. Matjamoe (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "compassionate support" seems to be a deliberate attempt to avoid using the word assistance as assisting suicide is illegal in most states.TimL • talk 21:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how I feel about the necessity of the discussion of an ethical controversy on this page. I'm assuming the ethics discussion would be regarding assisted suicide, which I don't think belongs on this page; I've added a link to assisted suicide in the first sentence of the article and that should suffice. If there's a controversy regarding how Final Exit aids its clients in committing this act, then that's another story, but as it stands, the "discussion of an ethical controversy" needs to be clarified before it should be considered for inclusion in the article. Amphy (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: I reread the other comments and while I think there should be some mention regarding any controversy around Final Exit beyond the two cases mentioned in the article, it'll need to be backed up by a lot of credible sources. Anyone have any? Then building a controversy section can begin. Amphy (talk) 02:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The POV tag should remain on this article. It is rife with extraneous text and NPV problems; needs help.Pdx97217 (talk) 00:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the introductory section to be more neutral. Hopefully this will allow the POV tag to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piano Concerto in F Minor (talk • contribs) 13:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Exit Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150825013906/http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/die-group-heads-sentencing-womans-suicide-33276605 to http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/die-group-heads-sentencing-womans-suicide-33276605

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]