Talk:Filmweb

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Second largest

"Filmweb is the second largest (after IMDb)[2] online database of information..." what about AllMovie??? Wich is largest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.229.140.149 (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently source in this article saying that Filmweb is second, I haven't found any sources claiming otherwise. Or stats for AllMovie, for that matter. But let's see:

Filmweb: As of 16 September 2014, there are 557,114 films, 43,447 TV series, 14,675 computer games and 1,912,634 persons in the database.
IMDb: According to its article, as of 2 September 2014, there were 2,993,252 titles and 6,085,458 personalities in the database.

Please note the important difference between the two databases: in IMDb, every TV series episode is counted as a separate title, while Filmweb only provides a list of episodes for a TV series title. Another difference is that Filmweb doesn't list all of crew/personnel names, only the 'important' ones. So, for example, you won't find names of engineering assistants, associate producers, personal assistants, etc. there. — Mayast (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]