Talk:Films based on works by Edgar Wallace
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Films based on works by Edgar Wallace article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Films based on works by Edgar Wallace appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Edgar-Wallace-Filme from de.wikipedia. |
Untitled
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]Edgar Wallace movies → Edgar Wallace – {Wallace's fame is for his movies, and thus this should be discussed just under his name. The movies part is superflous, and not encyclopedic} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
Voting
[edit]- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Oppose Sorry, I must object (disclaimer: I translated the article (about 30 minutes ago)). Both articles are of decent size, and the Edgar Wallace movie genre is very well known (at least in Germany). Discussion of this genre is highly encyclopedic. Also, Edgar Wallace is not only known for "his movies". And the movie influence he's best known for (King Kong) isn't even a Edgar Wallace movie. -- grm_wnr Esc 21:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC) (Moved from WP:RM --Lox (t,c) 08:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC))
- Support only, if there is no precedent for this kind of division. If there is, then I oppose the move.--Istabraq 00:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I read Edgar Wallace, and this is the first I've heard of the movies. Septentrionalis 01:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know of any precedent for this kind of division, but I certainly think it's a good way of ensuring reasonable page size. However, I think there should be a link from Edgar Wallace to Edgar Wallace movies - though I am not sure where! --Lox (t,c) 21:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Add any additional comments
Merging the articles would not require WP:RM. Septentrionalis 01:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Misleading Page Title
[edit]This page seems to be about the German films based on Wallace's work, and ignores the Hollywood films. Either it should be expanded to include other films, or re-titled to give a more accurate idea of the content. RGCorris (talk) 08:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)