Talk:Film Threat

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Questions about this entry

Is the full editorial staff necessary here?

Also -- is does this "coldest celebrity" list really get that much attention?

I, for one, wouldn't be too upset if you took those out. --Misterwindupbird 18:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should the magazine's title be explained? I, for one, knew about FT long before I'd ever heard of Film Comment.

Agreed. It's out. DONE75.174.130.129 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the "coldest celebrity" list gets a lot of attention. The most recent one, in November 2006, was featured on CNN, the BBC and the Reuters news wire. 205.247.175.179 17:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content and wild claims

There are a lot of bold and wild claims in this article simply unsourced. I will put the content back in after they are properly cited. Right now, saying that FT received "acclaim" or that "FT aided Tarantino in his career" is laughable at best. If you can find a clear source of quote that didn't come from FT magazine then I'm all for putting this stuff back in. But a lot of this reads like adverts that I suspect were placed into this page by former writers/editors from FT. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote your magazine.75.174.130.129 (talk) 18:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gone?

The website seems to be permanently down, I dunno how long it has been (maybe a internet archive search can say) but it would appear that Film Threat doesnt exist anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.229.170 (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]