Talk:Figure skating at the 2006 Winter Olympics

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Figure Skating Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sorry about the repeat edits. Technical issues. I deleted the sentence about Sarah Hughes because if she's been retired since 2003 she is completely out of the amature picture and not relevant to the 2006 Olympics. Also, about the word "defending", I meant that "defending" should be used only when describing that particular event, and only if that competitor is actually defending that title. --F a ng Aili 18:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's what you get when someone completely unfamiliar with the sport, like me, writes the page in the first place. So thanks. :) I've just done some more edits to the page - removed some unverifiable claims about "many commentators say" and "some say", and tried to reference the rest. If anyone have a source for it, they're of course free to add it back. Sam Vimes 22:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pairs skating edit

I added something about Zhang and Zhang, unable to footnote but added a url for source. I think the charactization of the Russian gold medal winners is slanted; I recall one female NBC commentator calling their performance "tentative" or "cautious", that they did one lift "so near" the edge of the rink. (He had dropped her in 2004 in a lift.) However, I can't find a reference to that so I didn't add it. They did skate a technically difficult program.

Totmianina & Marinin didn't give a great performance, but all the other pairs were even worse, so it is correct that the competition was not even close. Dr.frog 18:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think its unfair to say that the Russians weren't great and that the Chinese were even worse. I'm not a huge fan of the Russians but they delievered a solid (yet boring, in my mind) program and were CLEAN. Their lifts were not the best (as noted by commentators) and their twists and throws were unimpressive. The Chinese, however, skated with more heart and had HUGE throws, twists, and lifts.

What I want to comment on is how the Russians responded to the Zhangs' program. In the Wikipedia article and the linked article, it says they stood for the Zhangs. But how exactly does that prove anything? Most skaters stand backstage in anticipation. But the real reason I want to debate this point is their comments. Most people who saw the broadcast did not think T/M truly showed any emotion after the Zhangs fell. In the interview after, Tatiana said she didn't feel anything and called the Zhangs out on being "aggressive" in the warmup. This was critisized by MANY commentators. An example is on the show Olympic Ice where Scott Hamilton and Jamie Sale/David Pelletier were shocked at Tatiana's heartless comments. Even during the medal ceremony, Tatiana refused to hug the Zhangs and only gave them short handshakes.

That is why I think the line about the Russians standing for the Zhangs to give a false impression of their happiness or admiration of the Chinese pair and should be deleted for not giving the right view of the situation.

"Ladies" vs "Women"

Please note that "ladies", and not "women", is the official and correct terminology in the sport of figure skating.

References:

Dr.frog 13:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

revert to previous version by Jared. Do not change this back to ladies; the wikipedia community decided on women. see the debate here --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 20:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naaaa, why let facts ruin a perfectly good wikipedia community decision. Are you people for real? --Pelladon 08:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What authority does "the Wikipedia community" have to determine the correct rules and terminology for figure skating? Dr.frog 21:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Figure skating 2006.gif

Image:Figure skating 2006.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Figure skating at the 2006 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120612013348/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2006/Results/FigureSkating.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2006/Results/FigureSkating.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]