Talk:Field days in Australia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Field day/days
[edit]It should be added that the events are sometimes referred to as "Field days" depending on how long the event is scheduled to take place. Some are held over long weekends for example.--Sting Buzz Me... 01:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Not just Australia
[edit]- http://www.hpj.com/archives/2005/jun05/jun13/AnnualOvertonhorticulturefi.CFM - we may need to think about structuring the article to cater for other than Australian events --Matilda talk 23:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Other links
[edit]For others see: * Field Days Information which was deleted without any further alternatives.Cgoodwin (talk) 01:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Dab page
[edit]Currently the article has a {{tl:globalize}} tag and four links to similar pages. I have attempted to create a dab page but my efforts were reverted. The article needs improvement and splitting is the best option. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- The article's history needs to be moved with it which can now only be done by an Admin. Bidgee (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- So where does the article history go? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you had of used the move tab above on the article and talk page the content and history would have been moved together, Now the other page will need to be deleted by an Admin then moved. Bidgee (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- It needed a split not a move. Where do you think it should have been moved to? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure a split was warranted. The article could perhaps be moved (with edit history) to Field day (agriculture). I don't see there is any need for separate national articles at this point. older ≠ wiser 03:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Since there is a lot of info about Aussie I want to avoid systemic bias in Field day (agriculture). -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- That is an atypical way of growing articles. Generally, it is best to keep related topics on a single article and split only when they have grown to such an extant that multiple articles are feasible. The stub you created at at Field day (agriculture) clumsily duplicates much of what was in the version of Field day (Australia) that you split out. That redundancy make it more difficult to maintain the content in that general improvements might be made to the duplicated material that are not carried over to the other. Second, although there is some mention made of Field Days in New Zealand, is there evidence that Field Days are common anywhere else? If not, the complaint that the article is too focused on Australia is misguided. I'd suggest waiting for the verifiable content to materialize before creating some artificial divisions based on a presumption of bias. older ≠ wiser 11:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Since there is a lot of info about Aussie I want to avoid systemic bias in Field day (agriculture). -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure a split was warranted. The article could perhaps be moved (with edit history) to Field day (agriculture). I don't see there is any need for separate national articles at this point. older ≠ wiser 03:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- It needed a split not a move. Where do you think it should have been moved to? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you had of used the move tab above on the article and talk page the content and history would have been moved together, Now the other page will need to be deleted by an Admin then moved. Bidgee (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- So where does the article history go? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have moved this article's hatlink clutter to a disambig page Field day. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Field days in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010041156/http://agfest.com.au/about/history to http://agfest.com.au/about/history
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mmfd.com.au/History.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dowerinfielddays.com.au/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Field days in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080902051022/http://www.farmonline.com.au/events/agquip2008 to http://www.farmonline.com.au/events/agquip2008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Field days in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.fielddaysonline.com/community.php?action=view&location=54 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080721011757/http://www.margaretriverwine.org.au/fieldday/index.html to http://www.margaretriverwine.org.au/fieldday/index.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120717050959/http://margaretriver.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/field-day-postponed/269579.aspx to http://margaretriver.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/field-day-postponed/269579.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)