Talk:Fibrobacter succinogenes
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Fibrobacter succinogenes be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Ecology
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jimmyjon12 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Kmvsetecka (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 11:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Ineligible
( )
- ... that the microorganism Fibrobacter succinogenes could be utilized to make biofuels? Source: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Fibrobacter_succinogenes
- Reviewed:
5x expanded by Jimmyjon12 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough: - The article was not expanded fivefold.
- Long enough:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: -
Since Fibrobacter succinogenes is an efficient saccharifier of cellulose, it has a high potential to be used in the biological degradation of cellulose for biofuel production.
does not contain a citation. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
- Interesting:
QPQ: None required. |