Jump to content

Talk:Fibre satellite distribution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

External links to pages in websites which give information (or ideally original reseaarch) are, in my view, to be encouraged, but there`s a link in this article (number 2) which is to a sales page of a website. Is that acceptable ? --JustinSmith (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I think so (that's why I put it in!). The point being made is the economic viability of fibre over coax cable, and a sales page is the only way I could find to reference comparative prices. I'll try and find another, non-commercial reference but meanwhile I suggest it stays (but by all means substitute another copmpany's prices if you want). And in case anyone is wondering, no, I don't work for the Aerial Shack company linked to (or Global Invacom, for that matter). Satbuff (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fibre satellite distribution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]