Talk:Fiat G.55 Centauro

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fiat CR.32 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RFC bot 05:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too homerism and incorrect info

I removed some statements, it's not my usual attitude so i'll tell you why and how.

1-What does it means 'umbeteable fighter' at altitude? Better than what? P-38/47/51? FW Ta.152? I found any evidence of that.

2-always was a capable opponent. Maybe! Somethimes, neverthless, he had his bad days, like on 25 april 1944 (three shot down with few results, and the Fiat plants heavily bombed), or,on 1th July 1944, when Torresi was killed and five (2 G.55 and 3 C.205V) were shot down by P-47s, already the killer of the three lost on 25th april.

3- only 105 were built? Obsolete statement: atleast 25 years ago it was already clear that they were almost 300, even if not all completed and delivered to operational units (but still a lot higher than 105!). Stefanomencarelli (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiat G.55. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025010701/http://kurfurst.allaboutwarfare.com/Tactical_trials/109G-4_Guidonia/109G-4_vergl_Estelle-Guidonia_de.html to http://kurfurst.allaboutwarfare.com/Tactical_trials/109G-4_Guidonia/109G-4_vergl_Estelle-Guidonia_de.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]