Jump to content

Talk:Fiat 850

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spider headlamps

[edit]

The early spider did not have canted headlamps. The vertical headlamps were recessed into the fenders more deeply than the later(1968 and on) models and had canted plastic covers. This is why they were changed when introduced to the american market. Some states frowned on headlight covers at the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romaniantruths (talkcontribs) 02:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Engine specs

[edit]

I'm confident that all the 850 powerplants run counterclockwise(unlike the earlier 600, or the later 112). Also, the engine specs vary from different sources. Some books quote gross HP and others DIN. I'll check my shop manuals(a reprint of the original Fiat one, and a Haynes and a Chilton), and see what they say. I think it also might be a good Idea to mention the unusual head design(4 exhaust ports, but only 1 intake port), and the fact that It's an unusually late example of an engine with a permanent 'oil-slinger' type centrifugal oil filter. (This shortened the life of quite a few 850s because gas stations often had non-mechanics doing oil changes and some of them had no Idea what an oil-slinger was, or that it was supposed to be cleaned when the oil was changed. Romaniantruths (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

transmission

[edit]

While I'm checking the 850 specs I'll find some info on the icondrovert semi-automatic that some 850s had as an optional transmission.Romaniantruths (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiat 850 Special 1968.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Fiat 850 Special 1968.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Fiat 850 Special 1968.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiat 850 Spider (16.06.2007).jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Fiat 850 Spider (16.06.2007).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Fiat 850 Spider (16.06.2007).jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiat 850. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fiat 850. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not built in an Italian plant? Eh?

[edit]

Being a Fiat, I would have expected the plant that it was built at to be included in the infobox. Instead, we have Heilbronn, Germany. This is seriously weird. Boscaswell talk 08:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted and thanks for sharing what you spotted. It's been there since May 2018, but was entered by an editor without a track record, so speculation on whether it was a "good faith improvement" or mere mischief maybe doesn't take us too far. Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Correction. I remembered where to look it up. According to Werner Oswald ("Deutsche Autos: Band 4") they assembled 6,619 Fiat 850s at the Heilbronn plant between 1965 and 1967. I tend to trust Werner Oswald on such matters. However, without including the Turin plant in the info box - assuming that's where most of them were produced, which I'm reasonably sure it was, it would be perverse to include the Heilbronn plant on the basis of 6,619 cars assembled from (presumably) ckd kits shipped across the Alps Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the German production was branded as the Neckar Adria. Toasted Meter (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - and here's the wiki entry for Plant Heilbronn (still a bit of a work in progress till now, I think). Regards Charles01 (talk) 11:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]