Talk:Fes–Oujda expressway

Africa: Morocco Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Morocco portal This article is supported by WikiProject Morocco (assessed as Low-importance).

Highways: Africa Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the African Highways Task Force.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Numbering of the roads

There are some different sources using different road-numbers. The ADM, the governing/respomsible organisation, doesn't seem to use road-numbers in their publications.

So is this road (Fes-Oujda) sometimes using the A2 as being 'just' an extension of the Casa-Rabat-Fes expressway and sometimes having it's own numbering using A6.

I've written an email to the ADM hoping for confirmation which numbers to use. But if anyone of you has correct information on road-numbering please edit this at the correct locations: Fes–Oujda expressway (thus this artcile) Autoroutes of Morocco#Completed roads and Template:Highways in Morocco

Please DO ADD your source/reference for this to avoid any future confusion. Tonkie (talk) 23:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For now I changed it back to A2 as that seems the most correct numbering. Tonkie (talk) 03:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.welcomeurope.com/default.asp?id=1300&idnews=4275&genre=0
Triggered by \bwelcomeurope\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 01:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fes–Oujda expressway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307214538/http://www.adm.co.ma/key_dates.cfm to http://www.adm.co.ma/key_dates.cfm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adm.co.ma/projects.cfm?id=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]