Talk:Feroz Abbasi

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Africa: Uganda Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Uganda portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda (assessed as Low-importance).
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 15:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Uncreated world..." error

I have changed the words "..the uncreated world which is the Koran" to "...the uncreated WORD which is the Koran."

This was an obvious typo by the original author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.218.111 (talk) 09:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the excision of the identity section

I am confused by another contributor's recently excision of the "identity" section.

There was a discussion about the identity sections of the Guantanamo captives' article. This contributor had started

removing the references to the captives ID number from all these sections;
changing the format from point form to prose.

Other contributor's agreed with their concerns over using the ID numbers. I agreed to change the format of these sections, as I came across them, to eliminate the ID numbers. I've changed a dozen of so since then.

But I argued that these sections should remain in point form format -- as this makes the names line up vertically, making it much easier for readers to see how the names differed. I thought that this was the agreement those participating in this discussion had agreed upon.

So, again, I am very surprised that this other contributor has started removing these sections, without, so far as I can see, discussing it with anyone ahead of time. Geo Swan (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again nobody needs approval from you when making edits to this set of articles. Please do not forget that there are 650 different articles of 650 different individuals with different information and sources. Please have a close look at each individual article. There may be room and reason for such a section in other articles but not in this one. The minor misspelling in one of the documents here does not deserve a whole section that dehumanize the subject of this article no matter with or without the "Captive xxx..." IQinn (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was a discussion. You participated in it. Now you are doing something different than what was discussed, and I thought agreed upon, in that discussion. I make no apology for expecting a meaningful explanation as to why you are doing something different than what was agreed upon in a discussion where you participated.

You committed yourself, in your comment two weeks ago, on the wikipedia:help desk, to work cooperatively with others. I didn't say you needed my approval. I will say that if you actually plan to live up to the commitment you made you need to make a greater effort to explain your plans. The rest of us, the other contributors you should be working with, are not mind-readers.

As to your admonition that I: "do not forget that there are 650 different articles of 650 different individuals with different information and sources." What makes you think I have forgotten this? But I remind you they have elements in common. I continue to maintain that consistency is important. And consistency requires us to talk to one another.

You may be saying here that you agree that a section serving the same purpose as the identity section is worthwhile, for some article, but not for others. The rest of us shouldn't have to guess at your intent. If this is what you do mean, then I think it falls to you to explain where you think this dividing line is -- which kind of confusing identification you don't think is confusing enough to justify an "Inconsistent identification" section.

In this particular example your edit summary said: "remove the dehumanizing 'Identity' section with the "Captive 693..." alternate name is given in the infobox". Are you arguing that putting all the alternate names in the infobox is better than having an identity section? The rest of us shouldn't have to guess at your intent.

Consistency is important, collegial collaboration is important. I strongly encourage you to make a greater effort at trying to help other contributors understand your actions and your plans. Geo Swan (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edits follow common rules on Wikipedia and i have always done more than enough to cooperate. Once again do limit your post to the content issues and leave false ad hominem arguments out.

I told you the articles are different and some article may will have a "Inconsistent identification" section and others not. I do not see any reason for such a section here. Do you have any reliable source that speaks about "Inconsistent identification"? Or is it maybe an instance of WP:OR?

For "Captive 693..." Yes i think for this specific article it is the best to have the alternate name in the infobox. You may start a discussion based on that articles sources on that talk page.

I have given clear reason and explanation for the removal of this section in the edit summary and on the talk page here. Let me repeat my reason for the removal again. And please that is not a provocation it is a friendly attempt to bring us back to the content issue regarding the biography of Feroz Abbasi that should be discussed here. The minor misspelling in one of the documents does not deserve a whole section that dehumanize the subject of this article no matter with or without the "Captive xxx..."

I would welcome to have a civil discussion based on the arguments that i have given and the information, circumstances and sources for this article. IQinn (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Feroz Abbasi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]