Talk:Federation Square

	Australia portal Federation Square is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Urban studies and planning High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Factual Update to Federation Square Content

I would like to improve the accuracy of the Federation Square article with some minor edits. These include updating the list of cultural institutions - (some of institutions listed no longer operate) and adding a couple of factual details such as the date of construction, architect's name, etc..

Please note that I work at Federation Square and that I will strive to avoid a conflict of interest by only making the factual edits described above.

If you have any queries or concerns please let me know.

--Editor melb (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead. Sounds like it's needed. Rebecca (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New External Link added

I moderate the Culture Victoria website and have added an external link to images and video about Federation Square and the history of the site.Eleworth (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Size of the Screen

I noticed that the size of the screen was not to be found anywhere in this article and was extremely difficult to find on the interweb. Is there any particular reason for this, usually a permanent screen of such size would be publicised by not only the construction crew and architects but by the operators and the city of Melbourne. YuMaNuMa (talk) 07:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about bias within article

Federation Square has been/is still a highly controversial project I am concerned about the way this has been addressed in parts of this article. In particular, in 'Reception and Recognition' there is a statement which references 'The World's Best Squares' (reference 22). Unfortunately the relevant part of the article was provided by Fiona Whitworth, who seems to have posted the information when she worked for Federation Square Management during the square's opening. Using information which reflects positively upon the person/organisation who posted it seems to be a huge conflict of interest. I suggest this reference (and the statements that refer to it) is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.1.223.1 (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federation Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070828234126/http://www.federationsquare.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=256 to http://www.federationsquare.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=256

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]