Talk:Federalist No. 6

Federalist No. 6 has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 24, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government / History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 21 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andrew-Hartman-1. Peer reviewers: Nicoleescoe2000, SJFlood29, Watermelemily.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. AryKun (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

"The argument" maybe "This argument"?
"He also identifies...war-prone nations" Shouldn't the clause after the comma provide a contrast with the first clause here?
- It doesn't use "but", "however", "although", etc
"Madison used a similar empiricist argument as Hamilton" maybe better as "Madison used an empiricist argument similar to Hamilton's"
Plot summary seems accurate from a reading of the original document.
Images are properly licensed and used.
References are reliable and properly formatted.
Spot-checks:
- "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
- Millican, Edward (2014). One United People: The Federalist Papers and the National Idea. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 79–80. Verifies all claims made.
- "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
That's all I have.

AryKun, all changes made except the one noted above. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]