Jump to content

Talk:Federalist No. 24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Federalist No. 24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Wikisource link to infobox.
  • "already did not exist under the law of the time" But they did exist in 2 state constitutions, so this statement shouldn't be so all-encompassing.
  • "peacetime. He says that it is merely an assertion that lacks an argument behind it." to "peacetime, calling it a mere assertion without strong justifications."
  • The summary should also include the reasons Hamilton prefers professional soldiers to militiamen and his discussion on the necessity of a navy and garrisons protecting it.
  • "had such a provision regarding standing armies" Unclear what this is referring to, just say "had a prohibition on raising a standing army" or similar instead.
  • "complacence in that" to "complacence because"?
  • "advocated garrisons in the western frontier and along the eastern coast" to "advocated for the establishment of garrisons along the western frontier and eastern coast"
  • Sources seem reliable and are properly formatted; will perform spot-checks later.
    • Spot-checks: All sources checked verified the claims made.
    • "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress.
    • "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress.
    • Scott, Kyle (2013). The Federalist Papers: A Reader's Guide.
    • Epstein, David F. (2007). The Political Theory of The Federalist.
  • Nice work overall. AryKun (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AryKun, I've made all suggested changes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passing now. AryKun (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed