Talk:Federal Writers' Project

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

African diaspora Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Federal Writers' Project be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

i dont think that this is very helpful info. i have a project and this is no help we need better info

try this link

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pscarter/fwp.html

thanks man!

???

In paragraph four of the body, we find this quote:

"Blakey (2005) estimates that at any one time the Indiana office had fewer than 150 men and women on the payroll."

The article does not discuss individual states' participation outside of this quote. So, the question is, what relevance does it hold to the topic? Anyone? Help would be greatly appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.129.225 (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-Slave Narratives

Another project that is probably worth mentioning in this article is the ex-Slave Narratives, something that was a part of the Federal Writers project. As the Slave Narratives article directs to this page, it would probably be worthwhile to add this topic.

Dear anonymous, I'm not sure when you wrote your comment but I just added about slave narratives and Grapes of Wrath and social context, a few minutes ago before turning to the discussion page and seeing your comments but there is now something about the slave narratives, with 3 links. --Harel (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, i wrote that comment in 2008 i believe, after a talk/paper from a class on the topic. The additions are much appreciated, thanks. Dtheweather9 (talk) 00:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Federal Writers' Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Federal Writers' Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How much was cut from the budget in 1939?

Sentence in the "Controversies" section says: "By 1939, HUAC's tactics seemed to work, and the newly elected Congress cut $150,000 million from WPA budget, while quadrupling HUAC's funding."

Presumably this is either $150,000 or $150 million? The source is offline, so I can't check.

CitLonLiv (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The DeMasi book (p213) seems to have provided that text: A newly elected, more conservative Congress cut $150,000 million from the WPA budget in early 1939, while at the same time quadrupling HUAC funding to continue its investigations.

In The WPA: Creating Jobs and Hope in the Great Depression (Opdycke, 2016), in the details of the 1939-1940 Emergency Relief bill, it says The WPA was allocated exactly what Roosevelt had requested--roughly $1.5 billion--which was about the same amount it had received in the previous year's initial budget. But as in 1937, the new bill specifically forbade the mid-year additions that in the past had greatly increased the agency's annual income.

On the other hand, The Great Depression (Burg, 2009) says Congress substantially cut the president's request for funding of the Works Progress Administration (WPA) programs. Obviously, DeMasi (referring to the budget the year before the 1939-1940 Emergency Relief Bill) is a misprint. I think we're safest to just say the budget was cut. I'll change it. Schazjmd (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: History on the Web

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 March 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JF904806 (article contribs).