Talk:Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page is not about Battle for Dream Island, so please do not add information about it to this article. See Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? for more information. |
Should I create an article for Battle For Dream Island?
[edit]WP:BFDI |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This is what some people mean when they say "BFDI". The object show community is one of millions, and I'm wondering if it should be put here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F390:2A00:88A5:643F:8A33:56B6 (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC) GREAT THAT WAS MY IDEA!!!!THANK YOU 2001:56a:f390:2a00:88a5:643f:8a33:56b6! CephalaspisLyelli (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Well, it is possible... it could be listed under BFDI(web series) or maybe add a disambiguation page. It might be a good idea though, since the first video in the series has over 60 million on the view count. MarioFan129 (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC) I know I'm fairly late to this, but in my opinion, yes, an article about Battle for Dream Island should definitely be created. It has almost one billion views as a series on YouTube, it created an entire culture of animation (object shows), and the object show community has easily over one billion views on YouTube alone. Blubewwy (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC) If I can, I'll maybe work on a Battle for Dream Island article. But I would not delete and rebuild this page, because it is considered as vandalism. I think there will be an article soon about that. EditJuice (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
|
request
[edit]plz protect this page 2600:4040:712C:BD00:A0AC:4B20:ADAD:377B (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Why? It's received no edits at all in almost a month so there's nothing to protect against. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The best article ever created
[edit]this is the best article ever created Pumpkinless Spice (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:BFDI. 118.148.78.118 (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
How to advocate vandalism prevention?
[edit]The vandalism on this page caused by this organization's unfortunate abbreviation is cringe, to say the least. Does anyone know how to stop this and/or if Ulrich Kelber is aware of this? 134.22.84.45 (talk) 01:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- While I agree the name here is unideal, I don't think the current rate of vandalism (an edit every month or two) is sufficient to warrant any kind of protection. If you disagree the place to go would be WP:RFPP. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)