Talk:Fatigue (material)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 02:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Drive-by nominator appears to made only one very minor edit to the article. And with many unsourced sentences and paragraphs, and some unreliable sources (for instance the ones from Material Technologies Inc, Fatigue Technology, LAMPL, and the Cryogenic Treatment Database) this is far from meeting WP:GACR#C2. I think this can be a quick WP:GAFAIL. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- @David Eppstein thanks, I think I just need some pointers to where to start given the size of the article. Please feel to add more and hopefully by next year I will ask you to take a look before putting a GA request.
- Thanks for taking a look and sorry that an article of this importance was a quick fail FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2022 (UTC)