Talk:Father Goose (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Picture of Leslie Caron

The picture of Leslie Caron shows clothing and a situation that do not appear in the film. And it doesn't look much like she usually does. Does anyone know for certain that picture is what is says? Man with two legs (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I brought up the same issue (before it had a caption). The caption states that it's a promotional photo, not something from the film itself. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception Section

This article's section on the film's reception gives undue weight to criticism of the motion picture. Aggregate review site Rotten Tomatoes and the Internet Movie Database both show the film to be fairly well regarded. This section needs to be fixed. I may do it myself when I have a chance. Uncle Dick (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used two of Rotten Tomatoes' three Top Critics (Variety was neutral). The others are for the most part from newspapers I've never heard of or had no details available. But you have a point. It could use a favorable review to balance things out. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried the Halliwell Guide for a more favorable review, but the main write up was negative and the two outsider capsules it quoted were both dismissive. Gee, I like the damn thing. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 13:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me too... i thought it was the 'perfect' film role outcome/result/product/conclusion after Grant's 'Operation Petticoat'. 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:AD65:51C9:43C:9095 (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Mistake

The summary of the movie says that Commander Frank Houghton used a parachute drop to provide extra supplies to the island. In actuality, the parachute drop never happened. To quote the movie, "There is too much enemy activity in the area to chance a parachute drop, and he [Frank Houghton] suggests we make due with the supplies we have." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.217.150 (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Father Goose (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606083253/http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/66491/father_goose.html to http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/66491/father_goose.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]