Talk:Fashion capital

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fashion capital article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Fashion High‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Athenabantis.

Hello to anyone editing this page! I just edited/updated a related page, Fashion museum, if anyone would like to read it over and leave any suggestions or edits. Thanks! :) -Lmeyler02 (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago

Someone added Chicago to the GLM list, which doesn't appear on the GLM site -- Lucky Poppa

Keep an eye on 136.152.133.10

136.152.133.10 has made some edits with a bias towards Paris. Please help to keep an eye on them.--Just James 05:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal

Someone has added Montreal to the list without references and rearranged GLM's top five list! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.160.136.68 (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third reference

I removed the third reference which was listing other cities because it contains a reference that links to a page that no longer exists so it can't be verified, thus it isn't a true source anymore. Do not restore it unless you can come up with a working link 99.53.171.95 (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)ERIC[reply]

Suggestion about Tokyo

Wouldn't it be fair to include Tokyo in the list of the major fashion capitals? In today's fashion, it truly seems to be no less important than the other four. Tokyo has had ties to high-fashion for centuries, and more recently, they are a major epicenter of modern fashion.

I agree, Tokyo is a great influence in fashion these days. Japan in particular has a great many diverse styles not seen in other parts of the world (like Lolita fashion, for instance) and these trends have great impact on world fashion as well. I'd say go ahead and add it. -- AS Artimour (talk) 06:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is true, Tokyo is a major emerging fashion capital, but in the Global Language Monitor it came 12th in 2009, and even though it has been mentioned as an influential city in fashion, it still does not have a status comparable to Milan, New York City, Paris, Rome, London or Los Angeles. Cities such as Sao Paulo surpassed Tokyo this year.--Theologiae (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul? Tel Aviv? Turin? Fashion capitals? Get real!

In the references directory, there is absolutely NO PROOF that Seoul, Korea, Tel Aviv, Israel, and Turin, Italy are fashion capitals. So if anyone would like to post a reference why these cities are fashion capitals, then do so. Because until then, I am removing these three cities from the list...and they SHALL STAY removed until there is actual proof that they are otherwise. -- Ashley-kun

Who ever thinks Paris is the fashion capital is so wrong! (0ctober 3 2009)

I have been an editor of the 'Fashion capital' page and someone has had a very biased view on Paris (which I have changed, by the way). Paris is not the fashion capital of the world and hasn't been for over 15 years! Milan is, and according to the Global language monitor, Paris is third! I even have some French friends who say that Paris' fashion has fallen into huge decadence and the October Paris Fashion show is way less stylish than the Milan one!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.42.70 (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melborune stop!

Can someone please stop replacing Milan or other cities with Melbourne. Melbourne is a far minor fashion capital, and unless there is reliable and accurate proof that Melbourne is the fashion capital of the world, it cannot be listed in themain list of world fashion capitals. Someone is constantly rewording phrases to make Melbourne look like the top city in fashion, but if it even is a fashion capital, it is far minor compared to Milan, New York City, London and Paris. So whoever the person is, please stop, because it is vandalism.--Theologiae (talk) 08:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changes, including removing 'hijack' of page by Global Language Monitor

I've tried to improve this page as I was a bit horrified to discover such a wholesale focus on the work of Global Language Monitor. Not only was there copyright violation, with direct copying from its own rankings (wordings were copy paste and entirely unencyclopaedic), but it skewed the whole article towards its rankings...other perspectives do exist and the article needs to have a much broader and more solid historical context. I've added a new paragraph giving a defnition of a fashion capital (backed with further sources) and tried generally to pin down some suitable references throughout. This still needs improving and additional refs need to be sourced for the section on History – I'm still looking for a good ref for the rise of New York as it's a very important chapter. Libby norman (talk) 10:46, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fashion capital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A bit too much advertising ?

The section on "Annual fashion capital rankings" seems a bit of adv for this "Global Language Monitor" company... hmmm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lobianco (talk • contribs) 11:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this article is one big advertising, despite the fact that there are genuine and even scientifically approved lists out there (McKinsey, IFDAQ, WGSN, Bain etc). Just read one and that's how I ended up here after searching for fashion capitals. Anyone up to improve the article and invest some time here? ► robomod 10:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy to help. I am doing a research on this topic for my thesis. I found the ranking by Professor Godart from the IFDAQ that is also mentioned in the article. Deepdatascience (talk) 12:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to add references and respect the copyright license if you copy rankings. A biography about Godart would make sense as well, since he is mentioned and referenced hundreds of times throughout the articles. ► robomod 09:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 2017 ranking!!!

Hello,

On the wikipedia page it seems that it is, in fact, the 2017 ranking instead of the 2019 ranking. Here is the 2018 ranking: https://www.languagemonitor.com/global-english/new-york-takes-top-global-fashion-capital-award-while-paris-falls-to-no-4/

I hope my message will be taken into consideration. Bye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.140.91.252 (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. AntiCedros (talk) 08:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Language monitor removed

I removed the rankings and commentary, as they are not really by some well-established fashion authority but by a random language based firm. Yes, this gets some attention in the media, as it makes for easy articles, but it isn't really something we should so extensively and exclusively promote as of this is some scientific, official ranking of fashion cities. Fram (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed tag: sourcing issues

I've added the "disputed" tag because the sources need to be checked against the statements they supposedly reference. For example, I don't see how this supports "During the 19th century, with the powerful British Empire and young Queen Victoria on the throne (from 1837), London once again became a major fashion leader." Similarly, this talks about Italian fashion, but doesn't seem to support the first line of the "history" section. Coupled with the edit wars, the unsourced claims about the historical role of Milan, and the over-the-top language, I believe this article needs a thorough check. Fram (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]