Talk:Farkhad Akhmedov
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 December 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Farkhad Akhmedov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151210203031/http://rapsinews.com/judicial_news/20120613/263404404.html to http://rapsinews.com/judicial_news/20120613/263404404.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140428001805/http://www.aznar.az/en/charity.html to http://www.aznar.az/en/charity.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080123192859/http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/AssemblyList/ALMemberDetails.asp?MemberID=5866 to http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/AssemblyList/ALMemberDetails.asp?MemberID=5866
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
It says 1945 for the year of birth in 'background' which looks wrong. Just read about his divorce and the superyacht. 2001:8003:A928:800:CC3A:4CEE:A95C:6F45 (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Explanation for reverting the changes
[edit]Dear @Baylis22:,
You may have notices that I have reverted your last changes to the page. Let me explain my reasons:
1. Removed the following section "Akhmedov is a Muslim by birth and has a Muslim name and heritage. He has publicly dismissed the claims made by his ex-wife, telling the Russian business channel RBC: "She knows perfectly well that I am a faithful believing Muslim. Her statements are as insulting as they are false". https://rusletter.com/articles/billionaire_ahmedov_answered_the_doubts_of_ex-wife_in_his_muslim_faith""
- the citation is wrongly inserted inside the body of the text - the source is unknown and unreliable - Please insert a reliable source to support the claim of Farkhad's being Muslim by birth. Otherwise, please remove it as an uncited claim.
2. Removed the following section "His ex-wife has conceded she had a long-running affair with Mark Isle, the brother of one of her son's school friends, while she was married. Isle has said he regrets the relationship and that he now wants to put the affair behind him and move on with his life. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5736519/Toyboy-lover-wife-centre-Britains-biggest-divorce-admits-affair-destroyed-marriage.html" "
- the citation is wrongly inserted in the body of the text - "the Dailymail" is a tabloid publication and considered untrustworthy by Wikipedia policy. Please familiarize yourself with the list of reliable and unreliable Wikipedia sources here <https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_220> - the details of Tatiana Akhmedova's private affairs based on tabloid publication is not Wikipedia worthy information, since the matter of her disloyalty was already established in the second paragraph of the divorce proceeding section and cited by court documents.
3. Changed "legal battle" back to "legal actions"
- Legal battle implies emotional statement, while Wikipedia is an encyclopedia providing neutral provable facts.
I hope you can see my point of view and help the Wikipedia community to work together on bringing this entry to perfect Wikipedia worthy material.
All the best Simonjohngrey (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)