Talk:Farinelli (film)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Film: French / Italian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Untitled

Should be merged with Farinelli Il CastratoJbmas99 14:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Polylerus 21:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently a tag on the article saying that the plot summary is "excessively detailed." I'm a musicologist and have used the film in my classes for the past five years. I find the plot summary to be pretty reasonable; there is a very long sidebar on production details, so shortening the article would only leave a big blank space on the page. I'm going to clip it about 10% and then remove the tag. Bmwilcox (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?

There is a section headed “Controversy over historical depictions” which lists changes made from known history in the film, but doesn’t actually say why this is controversial, nor notes any controversy that might have happened upon or after its release. It may be useful to note that a film based on historical events and characters, and how the plot deviates from what is known, but it doesn’t follow that this is controversial, so the section heading seems misleading as it stands. Jock123A (talk) 13:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]